Key facts
- In a British study of 11,891 apparently healthy adults, the median estimated peak VO2 was 36.9 mL/kg/min for men and 36.5 for women, both with a median age of 48. 9
- One MET equals 3.5 mL of oxygen per kilogram per minute, so a VO2 max of 38 mL/kg/min is 10.9 METs. 5
- The NHS advises at least 150Â minutes of moderate activity a week, or 75Â minutes of vigorous activity, for adults aged 19 to 64. 1
- In a study of five wrist-worn trackers, the average error in VO2 max estimates was above 10% in every evaluation except the VO2 max estimate of one older Garmin model. 7
What is VO2 max?
VO2 max is the highest rate at which your body can take in and use oxygen while you exercise as hard as you can. It is written in millilitres of oxygen per kilogram of body weight per minute, shortened to mL/kg/min. Garmin, which sells running watches, calls it the defining measure of cardiorespiratory fitness and aerobic performance capacity.10 That is a company’s description, not a clinical definition, but it matches how the number is used in the research below.
Because the figure is divided by body weight, two people with the same oxygen use in litres per minute can have different VO2 max values. A heavier person scores lower. That is worth remembering when you compare yourself with a friend, or when your weight changes and your watch quietly updates your score.
VO2 max and METs
Exercise scientists also use the MET, short for metabolic equivalent. One MET is 3.5 mL of oxygen per kilogram of body weight per minute, so you divide a VO2 value in mL/kg/min by 3.5 to get METs.5 The unit is handy because physical-activity advice, exercise machines and many research papers are written in METs.
How is VO2 max measured? Lab test, field test and watch estimate
There are three broad routes, and they do not give equally trustworthy answers. The first is a laboratory test. The second is a timed field test. The third is the estimate that a watch or band produces from your heart rate and pace.
| Method | How it works | Main limit | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Laboratory test | Exercise to exhaustion on a treadmill or exercise bike while a metabolic gas analyser measures the air you breathe. | Needs equipment and staff. The large American reference registry holds 22,379 treadmill and bike tests, so it reflects that setting. | 38 |
| One-mile walk test | Walk a measured mile against the clock, then enter age, sex, weight in pounds, walking time and heart rate over the final quarter mile. | Sub-maximal, so it estimates. The original study covered 343 healthy adults aged 30 to 69. | 6 |
| Watch or band estimate | The device uses sensor data from ordinary activity. Garmin says it works without any special fitness testing protocol. | Error above 10% for most devices in one study, and 15.79% for one watch in another. | 1078 |
The Garmin line is the maker’s own description of how its watch works. The test details come from study abstracts, not from the full papers.
The laboratory test
The reference method uses a metabolic gas analyser in a controlled laboratory.8 The American FRIEND registry, which collected 22,379 tests from apparently healthy adults aged 20 to 89, used treadmills for 16,278 of them and exercise bikes for 6,101.3 A lab test pushes you to your limit, which is why you should speak to a GP first if you have a health problem or have not exercised for a while (see the last section).
The mile walk
A field test costs nothing but a measured mile and a stopwatch. The 1987 study that built the walking equation concluded that the one-mile walk provides a valid sub-maximal assessment of VO2 max.6 The equation uses your age, sex, body weight in pounds, your walking time, and your heart rate over the last quarter mile. The result comes out in litres per minute, and you divide by your weight in kilograms to get mL/kg/min.6
A mile is 1.609344Â km. Walking it in 15Â minutes means covering 1.609344Â km in a quarter of an hour, which is 6.44Â km/h, or about 4 miles per hour. That arithmetic only tells you the pace the test asks about. It is not a target.
A weight conversion you will need
The equation wants pounds, and British scales often show stones and pounds. One stone is 14Â lb, so 12Â st 8Â lb is 12 x 14 + 8 = 176Â lb. To get kilograms, multiply by 0.45359237: 176Â lb comes to 79.83Â kg, which is the figure you divide by at the end. The conversion factor is the standard definition of the pound and was not taken from the sources read for this page.
What do British figures for VO2 max look like?
People often ask for a table of VO2 max norms by decade of age. This page does not print one. The 2022 American reference-standards paper (FRIEND) is only readable here as an abstract, and the tables that carry the age bands were behind a paywall.3 The one openly readable FRIEND table in the research for this page covers heart patients, not healthy adults, so it would be the wrong yardstick. A table built from other sources would mean inventing cells.
What does exist is a British study. Researchers working with Nuffield Health looked at estimated cardiorespiratory fitness in 9,204 men and 2,687 women, 11,891 adults in all, who were apparently healthy.9 The median estimated peak VO2 was 36.9 mL/kg/min in men and 36.5Â in women, and the median age of both groups was 48.9
| Item | Men | Women | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Adults in the study | 9,204 | 2,687 | 9 |
| Median age | 48Â years | 48Â years | 9 |
| Median peak VO2 (estimated) | 36.9 mL/kg/min | 36.5 mL/kg/min | 9 |
| 25th, 50th and 75th centile at age 45 (estimated) | 31, 37 and 44 | 30, 36 and 44 | 9 |
Peak VO2 here is an estimate from a sub-maximal treadmill test. The paper’s age curves are in figures that could not be read as text.
Read the table with its limits in mind. Participants stopped when they reached about 85% of their age-predicted maximum heart rate, using the 220 minus age rule, so the VO2 values are estimates rather than direct measurements.9 Only about 22% of the sample were women, which the authors flag as a limitation.9 The centile curves fell after the age of 30 to 40.9
The gap between the sexes in this table is small: 36.9 minus 36.5 is 0.4 mL/kg/min in the medians. That should not be read as a finding that sex makes little difference. The women’s group is much smaller, and the American registry, built on measured tests, found values higher in men across all age groups.3
What is a good VO2 max for your age?
Without a sourced table by decade, the honest answer is a set of reference points rather than a verdict. The American registry reports that median VO2 max falls with age, and that on average the decline was 13.5% per decade, or 4.0 mL/kg/min, over six decades of treadmill data.3 Dividing 4.0 by 3.5 gives about 1.1 METs lost per decade on average. These are American figures, and an average decline says little about any one person.
A worked example in METs
Suppose a watch or a test reports 38 mL/kg/min. Dividing by 3.5 gives 38 / 3.5 = 10.86, so about 10.9 METs.5 A meta-analysis of 33 studies and 102,980 participants grouped fitness as low below 7.9 METs, intermediate from 7.9 to 10.8 METs, and high from 10.9 METs.4 Multiplying back by 3.5 puts those boundaries at 27.65, 37.8 and 38.15 mL/kg/min.
| Band | METs | Equivalent in mL/kg/min | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Low | Below 7.9 | Below 27.65 | 45 |
| Intermediate | 7.9 to 10.8 | 27.65 to 37.8 | 45 |
| High | 10.9 or more | 38.15 or more | 45 |
The METs bands come from the meta-analysis; the last column is the author’s arithmetic using 3.5 mL/kg/min per MET. The bands are not age-adjusted.
So 38 mL/kg/min sits right at the edge of the high band. Set against the British study, a man of 45 at 38 would be a little above the median of 37 and below the 75th centile of 44.9 Both comparisons are rough, because one uses measured data in a pooled analysis and the other uses estimates in a single cohort.
How accurate is a watch or band estimate?
Garmin says its watches estimate VO2 max during a normal run, with no special test.10 Independent studies are less flattering, though they test particular models and small groups.
| Study | Who was tested | What it found | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Passler 2019 | 24 people, five wrist-worn devices | Mean absolute percentage error above 10% for every evaluation except the VO2 max estimate of the Garmin Forerunner 920XT, at 7.3%. The authors say the devices did not show valid results. | 7 |
| Caserman 2024 | 19 people, Apple Watch Series 7 | Mean absolute percentage error of 15.79%. The watch overestimates or underestimates VO2 max in people with poor or excellent fitness. | 8 |
Both studies are small and test specific models. A result for one device does not carry over to another.
A mean absolute percentage error of 15.79% means that, on average, the watch’s answer was about 16% away from the lab value in either direction. For someone whose lab value is 40 mL/kg/min, that is an average miss of roughly 6 units, close to the 7-unit gap between the 50th and 75th British centiles for a 45-year-old man (37 and 44).9 The same study reports averages of 45.88 and 41.37 mL/kg/min for its two sets of values, a gap of about 4.5.8
Use the trend from one watch worn the same way, not the absolute figure, and do not compare scores across brands. A watch can also drift when your weight or pace changes. For a plain benchmark, the timed mile walk above is cheaper and better documented.
Can you improve VO2 max? What the sources say
The sources read for this page do not measure how much any training programme raises VO2 max, so this page gives no promised gain. What they do give is the standard UK advice on physical activity, which is where most people start.
- The NHS says adults aged 19 to 64 should aim for at least 150Â minutes of moderate-intensity activity a week, or 75Â minutes of vigorous activity.1
- Brisk walking counts as moderate activity. The NHS gives a simple test: if you can still talk but not sing, the effort is moderate.1
- The UK Chief Medical Officers use the same talk test and add that intensity is relative to a person’s own fitness.2 A pace that is easy for one person can be hard for another.
That second point is the useful one for anyone with a low starting score. Moderate for you is whatever lets you talk but not sing, not a pace set by a friend’s watch. If your score is low, the effort that counts as moderate is a lower pace than it would be for a fitter person.2
To follow progress, repeat the same test under the same conditions every few weeks: the same route, the same time of day, and the same kind of footwear. A change of one or two units from one test to the next is within the noise of most estimates.
Who should see a GP before a hard test?
A laboratory test takes you to exhaustion. The NHS advises speaking to your GP first if you have not exercised for some time or have a medical problem.1 The same applies if you plan to push hard to get a field test result. A timed mile walk is sub-maximal, but start by checking with your GP if any of those points describe you.6
If you feel chest pain, dizziness or unusual breathlessness during any test, stop. For an emergency, call 999. For urgent advice that is not an emergency, call NHS 111.
A watch estimate does not need that caution in the same way, but it does not make a medical judgement either. A low score on a watch is not a diagnosis, and a high one is not clearance to ignore symptoms. If a number worries you, talk to a GP rather than tuning your training around it.
Frequently asked questions
What is a good VO2 max?
It depends on age and sex, and no sourced table by decade could be built for this page. In a British study of adults with a median age of 48, the median estimated peak VO2 was 36.9 mL/kg/min for men and 36.5 for women. One meta-analysis called fitness high from 10.9 METs, which is 38.15 mL/kg/min.
How can I measure my VO2 max at home?
The most documented route is the one-mile walk test, which uses your age, sex, weight, walking time and end heart rate to estimate VO2 max. A watch estimate is easier but rougher: one study found average errors above 10% for most devices.
Is VO2 max the same as fitness?
Not quite. Garmin calls it the defining measure of cardiorespiratory fitness, but it is one measure of aerobic capacity. It says nothing about strength, flexibility or balance.
How accurate is VO2 max on a smartwatch?
Not very. One study of five wrist devices found errors above 10% in every evaluation but one older Garmin model’s VO2 max estimate, and another found a 15.79% error for the Apple Watch Series 7. Results for one model do not carry over to another.
Does VO2 max decline with age?
Yes. In an American registry of 22,379 tests, VO2 max fell with age and was higher in men at every age. The average drop was 13.5% per decade, or 4.0 mL/kg/min. A British study also found centile curves falling after the age of 30 to 40.
How can I improve my VO2 max?
The sources read for this page do not quantify what any programme achieves. The NHS advice is at least 150Â minutes of moderate activity a week or 75Â minutes of vigorous activity for adults aged 19 to 64. Speak to a GP first if you have not exercised for some time.
Does Elio measure VO2 max?
Chutex’s Elio page says the band estimates VO2max, as a wellness indicator. No validation of that estimate was read for this page, so treat it as a trend, not a measured value (see the accuracy section).
Sources
- NHS, Physical activity guidelines for adults aged 19 to 64 (last reviewed 22 May 2024), NHS. Retrieved 16 October 2026
- UK Chief Medical Officers’ physical activity guidelines (published 7 September 2019, updated 10 July 2026), GOV.UK. Retrieved 16 October 2026
- Kaminsky et al., Updated reference standards for cardiorespiratory fitness, FRIEND registry (Mayo Clin Proc, 2022), abstract, PubMed. Retrieved 16 October 2026
- Kodama et al., Cardiorespiratory fitness as a predictor of all-cause mortality, meta-analysis (JAMA, 2009), abstract, PubMed. Retrieved 16 October 2026
- Jette et al., Metabolic equivalents (METS) in exercise testing (Clin Cardiol, 1990), abstract, PubMed. Retrieved 16 October 2026
- Kline et al., Estimation of VO2max from a one-mile track walk (Med Sci Sports Exerc, 1987), abstract, PubMed. Retrieved 16 October 2026
- Passler et al., Validity of wrist-worn activity trackers for estimating VO2max and energy expenditure (2019), abstract, PubMed. Retrieved 16 October 2026
- Caserman et al., Accuracy of smartwatch-based estimation of maximum oxygen uptake, Apple Watch Series 7 (JMIR Biomed Eng, 2024), abstract, PubMed. Retrieved 16 October 2026
- Normative reference values for estimated cardiorespiratory fitness in apparently healthy British men and women (PLoS One, 2020), full text, PLoS One via Europe PMC. Retrieved 16 October 2026
- Garmin UK, VO2 Max (Garmin technology page), Garmin. Retrieved 16 October 2026