Menu

Comparison

Best fitness trackers in the UK: a dated comparison, with the real three-year cost

No single tracker suits everyone, and this page has not tested any of them. Starting prices read on 2026-10-16 run from £139.99 to £219.99, but plans change the sum. Keeping Fitbit Premium for three years takes a Charge 6 to £403.66, while the Polar Loop has no plan and stays at £149.50.56

Key facts

  • Prices were read on each maker’s UK page on 2026-10-16: Polar Loop £149.50, Fitbit Charge 6 £139.99, Garmin CIRQA £179.99, Garmin Forerunner 70 £219.99. 6
  • A review of wearable studies found trackers measure steps and heart rate well in laboratory settings, but no brand was accurate for energy expenditure. 9
  • The Oura membership costs £5.99 a month or £69.99 a year for UK members, and the ring’s own price was not stated on the page read. 7
  • The NHS advises at least 150 minutes of moderate activity a week, or 75 minutes of vigorous activity, for adults aged 19 to 64. 12

How was this comparison made?

This is a dated comparison, not a ranking. Chutex has not worn or tested any of the devices below. Every cell in the tables comes from a maker’s own UK page or a published study, and carries a source number. Where a page did not state a fact, the cell says so. Prices were read on 2026-10-16 and will move.

The criteria are the ones that decide most purchases: the price you pay on the day, whether a subscription is required or optional, the battery life the maker claims, whether the device has its own GPS or borrows your phone’s, and whether it has a screen. Battery figures are maker claims, not measurements.

Maker pages are commercial sources. They tell you what a company says its product does and what it charges, and nothing more. The accuracy section further down uses published studies instead.

How do the main fitness trackers compare?

Fitness trackers compared, prices as read on 2026-10-16
DeviceFormPriceSubscriptionBattery claimedOwn GPS
Polar LoopScreenless band 6£149.50 6None, as Polar describes it 6Up to 8 days 6No, uses the phone’s GPS 6
Garmin CIRQA Smart BandScreenless band 2£179.99 2None required. Garmin Connect+ is optional 2Up to 10 days 2No own GPS: uses the phone’s connected GPS 2
Fitbit Charge 6Band with screen 5£139.99 5Three months of Google Health Premium included, then £7.99 a month 5Up to 7 days 5Yes, built in 5
Garmin Forerunner 70Running watch with colour touchscreen 4£219.99 4None required. Garmin Connect+ is optional 34Up to 13 days 4Yes, built in 4
Elio (Chutex)Screenless band 11£264 as shown on its UK page, no VAT shown 11None, one-time payment 1115 days 11Not stated on the product page 11
WHOOPScreenless band, France page 8No British price read. The France page shows annual prices in euros, not used here 8Required, in tiers One, Peak and Life 8More than 14 days, France page 8Not stated on the page read
OuraRing 7Ring: not stated on the page read. Membership £5.99 a month or £69.99 a year 7Required for the membership features 7Not stated on the page readNot stated on the page read

Read on 2026-10-16 from each maker’s page. The pages do not all say whether VAT is included, and the Elio page shows none. Battery and GPS lines are maker claims. The WHOOP row comes from the France page, not a British one.

A few things stand out without any ranking. Three of the bands in the table have no screen: the Polar Loop, the Garmin CIRQA and Elio. The Fitbit Charge 6 has the lowest sticker price at £139.99 and is the only band in the table with built-in GPS stated. Polar says the Loop uses your phone’s GPS.

Two further points on the sums. Prices in the table are as shown on each maker’s page, and the pages do not all say whether VAT is included, so gaps between them are not always like-for-like. The CIRQA was listed as shipping in 8 to 12 weeks at the time of reading.2

Which kind of tracker suits which person?

Instead of a winner, here are the trade-offs the sources support. Pick the line that matches how you will use the device.

If you want sleep and recovery data without a lit screen on your wrist

The Polar Loop, the Garmin CIRQA and Elio have no screen. Polar says the Loop is screen-free and subscription-free and weighs 29 g.6 Garmin describes the CIRQA as a subscription-free tracker with 24/7 health and sleep tracking.2 Chutex describes Elio as a screenless wellness band, with measurements that are indicative and not a diagnosis.11 WHOOP also has no screen, but it needs a paid membership.8

If you want GPS for runs

The Fitbit Charge 6 has GPS built in.5 Garmin presents the Forerunner 70 as a running watch with a colour touchscreen and up to 13 days of battery.4 A band without its own GPS can still log a route if your phone comes with you, as the Polar Loop does through its app.6

If you want to keep the starting price low

On the prices read, the Fitbit Charge 6 (£139.99) and the Polar Loop (£149.50) are the two lowest. Look at the next section before deciding, because an optional plan changes the three-year picture.

If you prefer a ring

Oura makes a ring and charges a membership for it. The ring’s price in pounds was not available on the page read, so a ring cannot be costed here.7 See the separate smart ring comparison and the Oura and WHOOP comparison.

What does each tracker cost over three years?

A purchase price is only part of the cost. The sum below adds the optional or required plan for 36 months, using the prices read on 2026-10-16. It is an illustration of how plans add up, not a prediction.

Three-year cost: purchase price plus plan, prices read 2026-10-16
DeviceWithout a paid planWith the plan kept for 36 monthsHow the plan sum worksSource
Polar Loop£149.50No plan to addNone6
Garmin CIRQA£179.99£431.63 monthly or £389.96 yearly179.99 + 36 x 6.99, or 179.99 + 3 x 69.99 (Connect+)23
Fitbit Charge 6£139.99£403.66139.99 + 33 x 7.99, keeping Premium after the three included months5
Garmin Forerunner 70£219.99£429.96 with Connect+ yearly219.99 + 3 x 69.9934
Elio (Chutex)£264 as shown, no VAT shownNo plan to addNone11
OuraRing price not stated on the page readMembership alone: £215.64 monthly or £209.97 yearly36 x 5.99, or 3 x 69.99, plus the ring7
WHOOPNo British price read. The France page shows annual prices in euros, not used here 8Not calculable, no British price readNone8

The Connect+ yearly price of £69.99 was read from the page’s data, not shown in plain text. The Fitbit offer is shown until 26/05/27. The Fitbit page says Premium can be cancelled at any time, so the right-hand column is the cost only if you keep the plan.

Three-year cost with any optional plan kept, in poundsHorizontal bars: Polar Loop 149.50; Elio 264; Garmin CIRQA 389.96; Fitbit Charge 6 403.66; Garmin Forerunner 70 429.96.Polar Loop£149.50Elio (no VAT shown)£264Garmin CIRQA, Connect+ yearly£389.96Fitbit Charge 6, Premium kept£403.66Forerunner 70, Connect+ yearly£429.96
Sums from the prices in the table above.6112354 Plans are optional on the Garmin devices, and the Fitbit page says Premium can be cancelled at any time, so the longer bars are the cost only if you keep the plan.

Notice how far the order moves. The Fitbit Charge 6 has the lowest starting price, and the Polar Loop beats it only once the plan is counted. Over 12 months, the Oura membership is 12 x 5.99 = £71.88 monthly against £69.99 yearly, a saving of £1.89, about 2.6%.7

How accurate are wrist trackers?

Accuracy is the question the maker pages cannot answer. Studies can, within limits: they test particular models on small groups, and the devices change faster than the research.

What two published studies found, read 2026-10-16
MeasureFindingSource
Steps and heart rateIn a systematic review of 158 publications, commercial wearables were accurate for steps and heart rate in laboratory settings. Heart rate was more variable than steps, and Apple Watch and Garmin came out as most accurate for it.9
Energy expenditure (calories)The same review concluded that no brand was accurate for energy expenditure.9
VO2 max and energy expenditureIn a study of 24 people and five wrist devices, the tested devices did not show valid results. The authors judged them insufficient for sport or health purposes.10

Both sources are study abstracts. The studies tested specific models, so the findings do not transfer to every current device.

The practical reading is simple. Trust a tracker for steps, treat its heart rate as a good guide while you are still, and treat its calorie figure as a rough number. That also answers the question about weight: a calorie total from a wrist is not accurate enough to plan around, and this page makes no promise about weight. For the arithmetic of energy use, see how many calories you burn.

How can you compare two trackers fairly? A seven-day protocol

If you are choosing between two devices, borrow or buy one at a time and keep the conditions the same. This is a method you can follow yourself. Chutex has not run it on the devices above.

  1. Fix the criteria first. Write down what you want from the device: steps, sleep, resting heart rate, battery life or comfort.
  2. Wear each one for seven days. Wear the same device on the same wrist, day and night, so the weekday mix is the same in both weeks.
  3. Log the same three numbers. Record steps, hours slept and resting heart rate each morning in a notebook or spreadsheet.
  4. Check one number by hand. Count your pulse for 60 seconds after five minutes of rest, and compare it with the device. See normal resting heart rate.
  5. Note comfort and upkeep. Record how often you charged it, whether the strap irritated your skin, and whether you stopped wearing it.

Seven days is short, so treat the result as a first impression. Differences of a few steps or beats are within the noise of consumer devices.

What can a fitness tracker not do?

A tracker is a wellness device. It can show trends in your activity, sleep and resting heart rate. It cannot diagnose a condition. Elio’s own page describes it as a wellness band with indicative measurements.11

A tracker also does not set your goal. For adults aged 19 to 64, the NHS advises at least 150 minutes of moderate activity a week or 75 minutes of vigorous activity, and speaking to your GP first if you have not exercised for some time or have a medical problem.12 A tracker helps you count minutes. It does not tell you what is safe for you.

If a reading worries you, such as a resting heart rate that is always fast or irregular, speak to a GP instead of relying on the device. For sleep, see sleep stages. For a wider choice of sleep devices, see the sleep tracker comparison. For body measures, see smart scales.

Frequently asked questions

What is the best fitness tracker in the UK?

It depends on how you will use it, and this page has not tested any device. On prices read on 2026-10-16, the lowest starting price in the table is the Fitbit Charge 6 at £139.99, and the lowest three-year cost once any plan is counted is the Polar Loop at £149.50.

Do fitness trackers need a subscription?

It varies. Polar says the Loop is subscription-free, and Garmin lists Connect+ as optional on the CIRQA. WHOOP and Oura both require a paid membership, at £5.99 a month or £69.99 a year in Oura’s case for UK members.

Is a fitness tracker or a smartwatch better?

A smartwatch has a screen and does more on the wrist. A screenless band keeps the wrist free of a display. The choice is about whether you want a screen on the wrist or a quieter sensor. Both kinds appear in the table, with a maker claim for each battery life.

How accurate are fitness trackers?

A systematic review of 158 publications found them accurate for steps and heart rate in laboratory settings, with more variation for heart rate. It found no brand accurate for energy expenditure.

Which fitness tracker has the longest battery life?

Among the maker claims in the table, WHOOP’s France page says more than 14 days, Elio’s page says 15 days and the Garmin Forerunner 70 page says up to 13 days. These are claims, not measurements, and the models differ.

Can a fitness tracker help me lose weight?

This page makes no promise about weight. A review of wearable studies found that no brand was accurate for calories burned, so a tracker’s calorie figure is not a reliable basis for a plan.

Sources

  1. Garmin UK, Fitness watches and smartwatches (category page), Garmin. Retrieved 16 October 2026
  2. Garmin UK, CIRQA Smart Band (product page), Garmin. Retrieved 16 October 2026
  3. Garmin UK, Garmin Connect+ subscription, Garmin. Retrieved 16 October 2026
  4. Garmin UK, Forerunner 70 (product page), Garmin. Retrieved 16 October 2026
  5. Google Store UK, Fitbit Charge 6, Google Store. Retrieved 16 October 2026
  6. Polar UK, POLAR Loop, Polar. Retrieved 16 October 2026
  7. Oura, Membership (footnote on prices by country), Oura. Retrieved 16 October 2026
  8. WHOOP, home page (read from France, the British address redirected to the France page, in French), WHOOP. Retrieved 16 October 2026
  9. Fuller et al., Reliability and validity of commercially available wearable devices (JMIR mHealth uHealth, 2020), abstract, PubMed. Retrieved 16 October 2026
  10. Passler et al., Validity of wrist-worn activity trackers for estimating VO2max and energy expenditure (2019), abstract, PubMed. Retrieved 16 October 2026
  11. Chutex, Elio health band (UK product page), Chutex. Retrieved 16 October 2026
  12. NHS, Physical activity guidelines for adults aged 19 to 64 (last reviewed 22 May 2024), NHS. Retrieved 16 October 2026

This information does not replace advice from a qualified health professional. Chutex products are wellness products. They are not medical devices. Elder is personal protective equipment.

© CHUTEX SAS, Lyon, France. Editorial content, not advertising for medicines or medical services.